If
you have been paying attention (and I know that you all have) during the
conversation we have been having here now for more than nineteen years, you
might realize that there have been certain names that keep popping up. One, of
course, is a certain rock singer from New Jersey. In more recent months, you
have been treated to in depth analysis of the lives and legacy of the heroic
members of the White Rose resistance group from Germany during the 1940s. There
have also been numerous references to theologians and scholars like Matthew Fox
and Joseph Campbell and even our own Ralph Waldo Emerson.
And,
of course, there has been the Czech philosopher, playwright, and political
leader, Vaclav Havel. My first book was a biography of President Havel; I even
met him once. I think his life story is inspiring and exciting; his words have
stirred me and moved me; they have found a deep place in my heart and mind. I
remember the first time I heard him speak. He had me at “anthropocentrism”.
It
was in an interview with Barbara Walters early in 1990, on the 20/20 television program, I believe,
just a few weeks after Communism had been toppled in Czechoslovakia, and the
unlikely Mr. Havel, dissident and playwright, former political prisoner, had
become the country’s president.
“What
is the most important issue the world faces?” Ms. Walters asked the new head of
state.
I
thought he would say the arms race, nuclear proliferation, war and peace,
fixing the economy, something like that. But Havel—ever an unorthodox world
leader-- responded that the most
important problem in the world was anthropocentrism:
that is, that humanity had lost its sense of humility toward the cosmos, and
had put itself at the center of creation, rather than acknowledging those
greater forces of which it was part.
His
words reminded of those I had read from Solzhenitsyn some years before:
“If I were called upon to identify briefly the principal
trait of the entire twentieth century, here too, I would
be unable to find anything more precise and pithy than to repeat once again: Men have forgotten God.”
They were words from the address Mr.
Solzhenitsyn had given in May of 1983, on being awarded the Templeton Prize, a prestigious
award (sometimes called “religion’s Nobel Prize”) conferred on people who have
made “exceptional contribution[s] to affirming life's
spiritual dimension.” Other recipients have included Mother Teresa of Calcutta,
Rev. Billy Graham, Bishop Desmond Tutu, and the Dalai Lama.
It has been exactly thirty years
since Solzhenitsyn received that award in 1983. So, I thought it a good time to
get his address out of the files; quite literally (almost) dust it off; and
take a look at how his words and insights reflect the landscape—religious,
political, historical, even personal—that has developed in the years since.
What has changed? What abides? Was Solzhenitsyn (and by extension, perhaps,
Havel) a prophet, whose words ring more true than ever? Or was he a mere
religious reactionary, clinging for dear life to the ideas and trappings of an
age that was already dead and gone?
Certainly,
Solzhenitsyn ranks as a prophetic voice in stripping away any illusions the
West might have had about the allure of Communism and the superiority of the
Leninist way of life. The heroic experience of dissidents throughout Eastern
Europe (like Solzhenitsyn, and like Havel and Walesa and so many others)
exposed the Bolshevik lie so clearly that, in the end, even its defenders and practitioners had to give up the ship—and,
before our very eyes, overnight it seemed, the Empire fell, and the world was
changed.
It’s
hard to believe, sometimes, the inordinate power that the fear of Communism
held throughout the childhoods and youths of many of us (of a certain age, at
least). (For a few of us, even, the allure of radical Marxism was an
all-too-powerful siren, as well.)
But
now, with the exception of a bizarre place like North Korea (and perhaps Cuba),
traditional Leninism no longer exists on the face of the planet (good riddance
to it!). China is nominally Communist, but its rather strange hybrid economic
system is really more state capitalist than socialist. (China does not even
have universal health care any longer—in that and other respects China is even
less “socialist” than France, or Germany for that matter!)
So,
it’s getting hard to remember those days when the ideology and practice of
Communism held sway over broad swatches of this world of ours. But not only
that: this world changes so quickly that
it’s even getting hard to remember those heady and dramatic days when Communism
fell, and people’s revolutions won the day in one country after another—even in
Solzhenitsyn’s own Soviet Union, for God’s sake.
It
is as though we have lived through several successive generations of change in
the mere thirty years since 1983, but that in spite of all that, the world has
changed little (in essential ways, for the better at least) in the years since.
Many of the great hopes that were kindled when Communism fell have been
deferred. Economic injustice has not been vanquished. Economic inequality (in
the industrialized world, at least) has actually grown. Political turmoil is
still the rule of the day. The ideal of a “unified Europe” faces extreme
pressures and is far from being a dream fulfilled.
The
world has changed. And yet, it hasn’t. And we have grown much older in the last
thirty years.
So
what, then, are we to make of Mr. Solzhenitsyn’s explanation for all of the
world’s ills—“Men have forgotten God.”?
Certainly,
his words had a certain veracity to them when the “enemy”—the chief cause of
the world’s woes—was “Godless Communism”—a political system which denied the
Almighty, and exalted human reason and human achievement as the pinnacle of all
life.
But
what of our world today?
Is
it even possible to believe that the precipice this world stands at now—the
dangers it faces; the threats that imperil it—have been caused because there is
“not enough God” in people’s consciousness?
Hmmmmm…
A cursory glance at the news of the day would indicate that we can hardly lay
the threat of international terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism on the “lack of God” in its practitioners
worldview. No, there seems to be “too
much God” there, and not “not enough”.
Atheistic
Communism in the Soviet Union killed millions (60 million Solzhenitsyn says,
though I haven’t checked where he gets that figure from). The Communist Chinese
regime may have killed as many as 70 million. The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia killed
over 2 million men, women, and children (in a total population of about 7
million).
Horrifying
figures certainly. But what of the countless dead killed by marauding and
crusading armies who marched “with the cross of Jesus going on before”? What of
the blood-soaked land created by Columbus and those who came after him through
the genocide of the native peoples of the Americas in the 15th and
16th centuries? All coming to the New World with the blessing of
their Church, to spread their Faith far and wide, at the tip of a sword, if
need be.
Technology
has allowed 20th century tyrants to kill more efficiently, to be
sure. But men of faith have hardly stood blameless in this ongoing mayhem we
call human history.
Too
often, “Men have forgotten God” and the result has been tragedy and evil. But
all too often, too—as the world’s current experience with Islamic terrorism
would seem to indicate—it has been men (and women) “of God”—those who ostensibly
shout God’s name—Allah’s name—the most loudly, who have forgotten God most
profoundly. It is they who have turned their backs on the deepest ideals of
their faiths. It is they now who are pulling the world forcibly into the
whirlwind of terror and depravity.
“Remembering
God” is not the same as remembering all the teachings of this or that Church or
Faith; or being able to quote whole chapters of your holy scripture from
memory; or always being able to find the perfect Bible verse—or the perfect
verse of the Koran, or the Torah—to beat your opponent into submission.
Not
turning one’s back on God means remembering the deepest ideals of your faith,
and striving to live them out, every day of your life. Not turning your back on
God means not turning your back on all of God’s creatures—on all of your
brothers and sisters in this great human family. If you truly believe in a
Divine Creator, then how can you not see all people as all God’s children? And
if we are all God’s children, then how can you knowingly hurt or harm or even
kill one of your very own brothers and sisters?
Not
to forget God means not forgetting the fundamental reality that on this, God’s
world, we are all One. That in the ways of the world, we should strive to take
care of one another, especially of the weakest and most vulnerable among us.
That, along the way of the world, we should strive to walk together, just as
far as we can. Never forgetting the one who made us, never turning our back on
the holy, never closing our ears to the monitions of the Spirit, and God’s
voice in our souls.
But
always striving for ways that weave the web of life, and strengthen its fibers,
and reinforce its connections. Always striving for ways to unite with those
most different from us—even if that means putting aside the particular
preferences and practices of our chosen faiths for a little while, and finding
ways to work together and make the world better.
We
were not put on this Earth in order to win a theological argument and score
points for our religious team. We were
put here to practice acts of mercy and to further the cause of justice. That is
how we who are people of faith glorify the one who made us, and repay the debt we
owe, pennies on the dollar, but the best we can.
The
choice that the West faces (that the world faces) is not just narrow
fundamentalism on the one hand or cold and strident atheism on the other.
In
many ways, I think that Solzhenitsyn—stern judge of the weak and dissolute
Western world-- was quite right back in 1983. His words still speak to our
times. It may well be that we are immersed
today in an age of unparalleled callousness and selfishness. In the name of
“freedom” and “libertarianism”, our culture worships at the altar of Ayn Rand,
and our material possessions have become our gods. In banishing the evil spirit
of collectivism, we have forgotten the debt we owe to one another. In our love
for freedom, we have allowed ourselves at times to be tempted by false gods of
license and decadence.
But
freedom and reason—those dear offspring of the oft’ derided Enlightenment--
still stand as the West’s greatest defense against the whirlwind of history. If
we each just cling stubbornly to our own self-imposed, man-made orthodoxies,
then we face a Dark Age even deeper than that from which the civilization of
the West once emerged. But to accept the truth that our ideas can change, that
the forms and rituals of faith must be transformed in the light of new
experience, is to embrace wholeheartedly the power of a Spirit which makes all
things new.
In
our purely human reckonings, we have forgotten God all too often. We have
failed to heed that infinite voice which speaks to each individual heart and
conscience. “Only a God can save us now,” the German philosopher Heidegger once
wrote. Or perhaps only being attuned to the deepest and fullest that is within
us can give this world hope.
There
are forces of evil alive in this world, which only the most naive can deny. May
we strive to join with men and women of goodwill everywhere—whatever their
faith, and even if they profess no faith--
to stand in opposition to these forces. May we act bravely and boldly in
the face of the challenges ahead of us.
But
may we also stand humbly and quietly and listen for the voice of God within.
Then, deeply immersed in a spirit of love, let us resolve to build for those
who will come after us a world dedicated to justice and to peace.
Love your stuff, Jeff. I hope you'll post your edited sermons regularly, so that those of us who follow your lead have something to hang onto when you aren't in the pulpet any more.
ReplyDelete